Sunday, February 15, 2015

JR Newsletter: 15 February 2015 (228)



This week, the JR Newsletter brings LOTS of information to you.  For starters, we are fortunate to have David Finkelstein sharing his findings on topics from the early US Mint.

Silver & Gold Registers Of The First U. S. Mint
By David Finkelstein

In the 21st century, if someone needs additional recurring information in one of their business logs, the required number of columns would simply be added into their Excel spreadsheet.  In the 18th century, adding recurring information into an existing business log usually required the purchase of a new log book.  Whereas an Excel spreadsheet can have an unlimited number of columns, a paper log book is usually limited to the number of columns that could be handwritten on adjacent left and right pages.

The first U. S. Mint utilized multiple log books.  When similar log books are analyzed, different handwriting styles can be observed.  This indicates that some of the logs were maintained by different officers or clerks.  Although partially redundant, these logs most likely assisted in the quarterly balancing of the monies and precious metals that moved throughout the Mint on a daily basis.  Four similar log books that are stored at the National Archives and Records Administration in Philadelphia are as follows:

1.     The Register of Silver Deposits or “The Register of Certificates of the Standard Weight of Silver Bullion, Deposited For Coinage”,
2.     The Register of Silver Bullion or “The Register of Silver Bullion Received From Individuals and of Coins Paid at the Treasury of the Mint”,
3.     The Register of Gold Deposits or “The Register of Certificates of the Standard Weight of Gold Bullion, Deposited For Coinage”, and
4.     The Register of Gold Bullion or “The Register of Gold Bullion Received From Individuals and Coins Paid at the Treasury of the Mint”.

The Register of Silver Deposits and The Register of Gold Deposits are one page logs.   The Register of Silver Bullion and The Register of Gold Bullion are two page logs.  Each book is 13 inches wide and 18 inches high.  The columns in each book are as follows:

Column In Log Book
Register Silver Deposits
Register Silver Bullion
Register Gold Deposits
Register Gold Bullion
Date of Certificate
X     

X     

No. [probably Certificate #]
X     

X     

By Whom Deposited
X     
X     
X     
X     
Gross Weight (ozs, dwts, gr)
X     
X     
X     
X     
Standard Weight (ozs, dwts, gr)
X     
X     
X     
X     
Value (dollars, cts, m)
X    

X     

When Deposited
X     

X     

When Received

X     

X     
No. Receipt

X     

X     
Description of Bullion

X     

X     
Sums Paid, Including Discounts
(dollars, cts, m)

X    

X     
When Paid

X     

X     
Remarks

X     

X     

Figure 1 shows the entries in The Register of Gold Deposits for gold certificates 1 through 5.  Figures 2 and 3 show the corresponding entries in The Register of Gold Bullion.  Note that the Value and Sums Paid columns are in Dolls or Dollars, Cts. (or Cents) and m.  “m.” is the abbreviation for mil, mill or mille (depending on which country you live in).  1 mille equals 1/1000.  One cent equals 10/1000th of a dollar or 10 milles or 10 m.  A half cent equals 5/1000th of a dollar or 5 milles or 5 m.



Figure 1 - The Register of Gold Deposits – Certificates 1 – 5






Figure 2 - The Register of Gold Bullion – Receipts 1 – 5: (Left Page)



Figure 3 - The Register of Gold Bullion – Receipts 1 – 5: (Right Page)



Figure 4 shows an interesting entry made in the Register of Silver Deposits.  It is for silver certificate number 57, issued on June 19, 1797.  The deposit was valued at $300.00.  The depositor was Thomas Jefferson, Vice President of the United States.




Figure 4 - The Register of Silver Deposits – Thomas Jefferson



There were 5 major phases required for the conversion of silver or gold bullion into coins:
Deposit Bullion → Assay → Melt & Refine → Strike Coins → Return Coins

The four log books described in this article assist researchers in determining the endpoints of the timeline for each bullion deposit and coin return.  What about the phases that occurred in-between?  To be continued…
------

Next, John Okerson wrote with an inquiry concerning early quarters:
 

I would like to find a conversion table for Early Quarter dollars from the numbering used by Robert Duphorne to the Browning standard in use today.  Duphorne published The Early Quarter Dollars of the United States in 1975.  Louis Scuderi wrote about him in 2005 in JRCS Volume 18 Issue #2 of June 2007.  Not long after that article both Steve Tompkins and Rory Rea and all published new books on the same series.

Duphorne’s book may not be mainstream but is available online currently at about $20.

Anyone having this information is requested to share it with johnokerson(at)gmail.com or participate in correlating the data in the books.

John
------

Don Stoebner asked a question:

Why no participation at this upcoming EAC? I was told by an officer of EAC that this was not decided by EAC. The joint meeting and information sharing seemed to work rather well.I feel that the members of JRCS should be given a good answer for this change.

Don S
------

Readers will likely recall that Rich Uhrich wrote to us recently to tell about an 1838-O half dollar that he purchased for inventory and is offering on his website ( Rich Uhrich Half Dollars ).  Kevin Flynn wrote to announce a book on the topic of 1838-O half dollars:



The 1838-O Half Dollar, An Alignment of the Stars, by Kevin Flynn and John Dannreuther is now available. 8-1/2 by 11, 100 pages, softcover only.  The following is a summation of this incredible variety.

To meet the increasing demand for coinage for commerce, Congress authorized three new mints in 1835.  One of the chosen locations was in New Orleans, a city strategically located on the Mississippi River that would help in disbursing coinage throughout the south and west.  The Philadelphia Mint supplied equipment vital to coinage production such as three steam powered coining presses, each of a different size.  David Bradford was hired as the Superintendent of the New Orleans Mint with Tyler Rufus employed as the Coiner.  Robert M. Patterson was the Director of the Mint from 1835 through 1851. 

The New Orleans Mint opened in 1838 and in anticipation of commencing coin production, on February 14th, Tyler requested working dies for the silver half-dime, dime, and half dollar.  Between April 9th and 11th, two sets of 1838 dated half-dime, dime, and half dollar working dies were sent from Philadelphia to New Orleans.  All working dies sent were shipped in a softened state, and required hardening and polishing at the New Orleans Mint.  For the two sets of half dollar working dies sent, one set had a false border while the other did not.  Both half dollar working dies required being put through a lathe at the New Orleans Mint.  Director Patterson was very conscientious about theft of these working dies and their illegal use to strike coins.  All of these working dies were in a state that they could not have been used by the Philadelphia Mint prior to shipping to strike coins at the Philadelphia Mint.  These dies were not sent to New Orleans especially prepared or intended to strike proof coins or to test the design or alloy.  As stated by Patterson, these working dies were the same used in Philadelphia except for a mint mark added.

On May 8th, 1838, Tyler struck thirty dimes on the small coining press before having mechanical problems.  One specimen was sent to Director Patterson, ten were put in a cornerstone of a new building, with the remainder being given out as mementos.  Additional dimes were struck up through July 1838.  Between August 2nd and November 1st, the New Orleans Mint was closed because of yellow fever.  Dimes and half-dimes were struck in December and the beginning of January 1839. 

On January 17th, 1839, Director Patterson stated that no time should be lost in getting ready for the coinage of the half dollars.  Between January 17th and the end of January, Tyler was able to get the large coining press into operation to be used for the half dollars. Tyler found that the half dollar working dies were too short to be held in place by the screws.  In order to test the large coining press, he built a support system to raise the bottom working die to reach the screws.  He was able to strike ten "excellent impressions" from a single set of 1838 dated half dollar working dies before the support system was crushed.  The time frame in which these ten 1838-O half dollars were struck is based upon a letters from Rufus Tyler on February 25th and Superintendent Bradford on March 7th.  Bradford stated in his letter that Tyler had struck a few half dollars in the middle of January on the large press.  No 1838-O half dollars were submitted to Philadelphia for the annual assay sent on January 17, 1839.  The fields of these ten coins exhibit a brilliant surface texture expected from a new pair of working dies.  The striking characteristics of the design elements and rims are very strong. 

Between February 26 and March 12, 1839, three pairs of 1839 dated half dollar dies were sent to the New Orleans Mint.  Two sets of these arrived on March 16th.  On March 29th, Superintendent Bradford stated that Tyler was able to get the half dollar coining press into operation and commenced striking half dollars on March 27th.  The reverse used for the 1838-O half dollars in late January 1839 was moved from the large coining press to the half dollar coining press and used to strike 1839-O half dollars.  This reverse is found on ninety percent of the known 1839-O half dollars.

The key to a second striking was found in the 1838-O half dollar in the Smithsonian Institution collection.  This specimen exhibited the latest die stage of any of the nine known 1838-O half dollars.  The fields on the reverse display mirrored surfaces equal to the 1838 proof half dollar at the Smithsonian.  The striking characteristics of this coin were also stronger than the 1838 proof half dollar.  There are several 1839-O half dollars that have been categorized as proof coins.  Two or three of these coins exhibited diagnostics that were later than any of the first eight known specimens, but earlier than the 1838-O Smithsonian specimen.  The 1838-O Smithsonian half dollar also has stronger striking characteristics than the 1839-O half dollars that are called proofs.  A conclusion can be made that in late March 1839, Tyler was able to get the half dollar coining press into operation.  He first used an 1839 dated obverse with the reverse used for the 1838-O half dollars and struck several half dollars.  Tyler then replaced the obverse with the 1838-O half dollar working die, increasing the striking pressure and struck one or more 1838-O half dollars.  He then continued to strike 1839-O half dollars.

The two 1838-O half dollar working die obverses were defaced on June 13, 1839.  A note allegedly from Rufus Tyler published in 1894 stated a specimen was given to Alexander Bache and that not more than twenty specimens were struck.  Nine 1838-O half dollars are known to exist today, including one in the Smithsonian Institution collection.  Most likely, eleven to fifteen 1838-O half dollars were struck with only one specimen known from the second striking.  The 1838-O Smithsonian half dollar should be classified as a proof, whereas the remaining coins should be classified as specimen coins.

Price for the softcover is $29.95. To order, send a check or money order to Kevin Flynn, P.O. Box 396 , Lumberton , NJ 08048Please include $5 for media shipping or $10 for first class shipping.  Please email me at kevinjflynn88(at)yahoo.com to reserve a copy.  See other books available at www.kevinjflynn.com




 

Sunday, February 8, 2015

JR Newsletter: 8 February 2015 (227)

This week's JR Newsletter is a rather robust presentation of news and information. 

First, Brad Karoleff wrote in response to John Okerson's question about JRCS participation at the EAC meeting.  Brad also wrote about other subjects:

In response to John, there will be no official JRCS participation at the EAC conference this year.  There will be a couple of dealers that have crossover coins that will be attending the convention.  I have not seen any list of the educational seminars scheduled as of yet.  If you decide to attend the show I'm sure you will have a good time and see many wonderful coins, some may even be silver!

I would like to encourage anyone working on something for publication in the John Reich Journal to submit it to me as soon as possible.  I am scheduling a spring issue, around March, and we have to have one out pre-ANA, July.  Currently the cupboard is pretty bare!  I look forward to an avalanche of information for publication this year.

Finally, from the editor:
  I blame it on Skynet ;) 

In response to our e-editor with apologies for spelling errors....

Hasta la vista and I'll be back!

Brad Karoleff
------

John Okerson wrote:

I am a moderately new member of JRCS – #1475.  I have purchased a few of the back issues from Bryce Brown.  The LSCC folks offer Collective Volumes 1 through 5 which cover multiple years within a single volume.  While not up to date, it makes a great step forward for someone just starting and is substantially cheaper than buying a complete collection.  Has there been any discussion about doing such a series of our books?

An alternative might very well be to provide or at least to offer a DVD containing all of the past issues the way EAC does when one subscribes to their group.

Just a thought.

John
------

W. David Perkins wrote:

2015 Early U.S. Silver Dollar Census

The 2015 JRCS Silver Dollar Census for the early silver dollars 1794-1803 will be published in the next issue of the John Reich JournalIf you are a JRCS member and have not yet sent your early dollar Census information to me, please try to do so in the next few weeks.  

If your collection was included in the last census (which was published in Volume 21 / Issue 1, February 2011) you may send changes and additions only, if you like.  I do have one new and fairly substantial collector’s Census.  And so far, none of the censuses submitted include an example of the newly discovered 1803 B-8, BB-157 die marriage!  Keep looking.

 At a minimum, please include date, Bolender (B) and / or Bowers-Borckart (BB) numbers, your numerical grade (raw, NGC, PCGS or other).  Some members include die state information, pedigree and other decriptive information.  This is welcome if you would like to include it.

 As always, I welcome your questions, comments and suggestions regarding the rarity ratings for the early dollars.

 If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me at wdperki (aT)attglobal.net . You may send your Census to me at this e-mail address, or mail to it me at

P.O. Box 3039, Centennial, CO  80161-3039

Thanks,
W. David Perkins
Centennial, CO
------

And the final contribution is one you won't want to miss:

David Finkelstein wrote a two-page article entitled, “Weights & Measures Of The First U S Mint” and provided it here for readers of the JR Newsletter.  



By David Finkelstein


There were two weight measurement systems in use when the United States Mint began copper coining operations in 1793, silver coining operations in 1794 and gold coining operations in 1795 --- Avoirdupois and Troy.  The Metric system was not in use yet, as it was first utilized in France in 1799, and officially sanctioned for use in the United States in 1866. 

So which system of measurement did the first United States Mint use?  The numerous documents and log, ledger and warrant books that are stored at the National Archives and Records Administration (or NARA) in Philadelphia provide the answer.  Figure 1 is the first entry in the Bullion Waste Book, and is dated July 18, 1794.  It specifies that the Bank of Maryland made the first silver bullion deposit.  The gross weight was 94,532 ounces 0 pennyweights (abbreviated as dwts), and its standard weight was 69,953 ounces 13 pennyweights.  Since the weight included pennyweights, the Troy weight system was used to record gross and standard weight, as the Avoirdupois weight system does not use the pennyweight measure.

(Editor's note:  click on either image to open a larger version)
 

 Figure 1 – Bullion Waste Book Entry: July 18, 1794




Troy weight is based on a pennyweight consisting of 24 grains, an ounce consisting of 20 pennyweights (480 grains), a pound consisting of 12 ounces, and a ton consisting of 2,450 pounds.  Avoirdupois weight is based on an ounce consisting of 16 drams or 437.5 grains, a pound consisting of 16 ounces, and a ton consisting of 2,000 pounds.

So one would think that the first United States Mint weighed metals utilizing Troy counterweights on an Equal Arm Beam Scale (invented around 5000 B.C.), a Steelyard (or Roman) Balance Scale (invented around 500 B.C.), or a Roberval Scale (invented around 1660).  If you thought that, you would be wrong.  Figure 2 is part of an entry in the Bullion Waste Book, dated August 24, 1794.  It specifies that the silver deposit made by the Bank of Maryland was not weighed correctly due to “the inaccuracy of the Avoirdupois weights by which it was first weighed”.  One can infer from this entry that the silver deposit was weighed on a scale that utilized Avoirdupois counterweights, then the Avoirdupois weight was manually converted to its Troy weight equivalent.
 

 Figure 2 – Bullion Waste Book Entry: August 24, 1794




All weight entries made in the Register of Silver Bullion, the Register of Silver Deposits, the Register of Gold Bullion, the Register of Gold Deposits, the Bullion Journal, and the Bullion Waste Book specify a dwts or pennyweight component, therefore the weight was specified as Troy weight.  Although it seems illogical and counterproductive, it appears that the first United States Mint had a scale with Avoirdupois counterweights.  Once the Avoirdupois weight was determined, it was manually converted to its Troy weight equivalent.

So which system of measurement did the first United States Mint use?  The Mint utilized both the Avoirdupois and Troy weight systems.  By the way; what were the Register of Silver Bullion, the Register of Silver Deposits, the Register of Gold Bullion, the Register of Gold Deposits, the Bullion Journal, and the Bullion Waste Book ?  To be continued…





Sunday, February 1, 2015

JR Newsletter: 1 February 2015 (226)



The minds of many are on topics other than coins today, but we do have a couple things numismatic for you to consider.

 Ron Swerdloff wrote:

The talk by Winston Zack on contemporary counterfeit bust dimes sounds like a terrific topic. I have never had a face to face meeting with Winston although we have communicated on a number of occasions about an area of common numismatic interest: 3 cent silver coins. In the process of collecting this relatively out of favor small US coin I acquired a number of contemporary counterfeits. In the present inflated world it is hard imagine the effort/gain ratio of making small numbers of small coins but there apparently was a perceived benefit or perhaps a pleasure in fooling people. My interests have evolved over my numismatic years into Colonial “American” and Spanish Coins. These coins were routinely counterfeited and in the latter case I have an example of a contemporary Spanish 8 Real counterfeit with a contemporary counterfeit English counter-stamp. I suspect that the two counterfeit efforts were serial rather than concurrent.

I hope I can join other members of JRCS at Winston’s talk.

Regards,
Ron Swerdloff
------

John Okerson wrote:
I haven’t heard much about JRCS participation and activities at the forthcoming EAC conference.  I’d sure like to know so I might optimize my time there. 

John Okerson

Sunday, January 25, 2015

JR Newsletter: 25 January 2015 (225)



Readers who plan to attend the Portland ANA Show in March will want to play close attention to this week's lead story.  Also, Bob Stark shares an inquiry with us.

First, JRCS news about the Spring ANA:

We have confirmation on a JRCS get-together at the Spring ANA in Portland, Oregon.  The John Reich Collectors Society will meet on Friday, March 6 at 8:30 AM in Room E143.  This information will be published in the official show guide as well.  What you won't see in the show guide is the exciting, more detailed information that you will find here.  The highlight of the JRCS meeting will be a presentation by Winston Zack.  Winston has developed a brief presentation on the topic of contemporary counterfeit bust dimes. 

Winston says, "there is a growing interest in contemporary counterfeits in the last couple of years, especially with Davignon's updated second edition of his book, "Contemporary Counterfeit Capped Bust Half Dollars," and "Early Quarter Dollars of the United States Mint" by Rea, Peterson, Karoleff, and Kovach.  It would be only natural to continue the discussion of counterfeiting America's earliest Federal silver coinage by presenting on counterfeit bust dimes."

If you are a JRCS member or just interested in the topic, you are welcome to attend!  The meeting will conclude in time for attendees to get to the bourse for the "opening bell."

------

Bob Stark wrote:

A query for fellow JRCS'ers:
Have you seen clips on early dollars?  Are they common?  One might think that planchets prepared in advance and having imperfections might have gone to melt along with the poor strikes.

Best regards,
Bob Stark

Sunday, January 18, 2015

JR Newsletter: 18 January 2015 (224)



This "post-FUN" edition of the JR Newsletter is chock-full of interesting stories, revelations, and opinions about coins.  I'm sure you will find it enjoyable!

Matt Lenore wrote:

I was speaking with Lance Keigwin recently about the 1809 O108a half. It has a series of "embossed segments" as he notes them on the reverse, caused by something damaging the die during the minting process. Apparently it's unknown what the culprit was, but it's thought to be some sort of tool. The coin is seen here:

When I saw it, it reminded me of some strange marks on the reverse of the 1806 B7 quarter, seen here:

Both sets of marks have the same basic shape, and radiate in a gentle semicircle. I see particular similarity between the small marks at the base of the eagle's wing on the 1809 half and the marks on the 1806 quarter.

The coins were only struck 3 years apart, and so presumably whatever damaged the quarter was still part of the minting process when the half was produced. Does anyone have a guess as to what made these marks? Are there other coins with these "embossed segments"? Or is this just coincidental and similar marking, with different causes?

Photo credits to Lance Keigwin.

Matt

Editor's Note:  The photos that Matt discussed have been placed below for ease of viewing.  The links above, however, will provide obverse pictures also.



------

Steve Crain wrote:

As the Secretary of the JRCS, I wish to thank those members who have dutifully mailed their 2015 annual dues payments, to ensure that they will continue to receive their copies of the John Reich Journal. The dues notice, which was included in Volume 24, Issue 3 of the John Reich Journal, was mailed to you in December, and all current members should have received one. We requested that dues be paid before January 31, which is just two weeks away. Many of you have already mailed your dues payment, and to those members I offer my sincere thank you, but several have procrastinated, so this is a friendly reminder to send that payment before January 31.

I also wish to thank the several members who thoughtfully included a friendly note of thanks, and even a holiday wish or two, which are very much appreciated. Most members included the bottom portion of the payment notice; some even filled it out. Many members included their membership number which is printed on your address label, making the record-keeping so much easier, but some did not. Most members even made their dues checks payable to the 'John Reich Collectors Society', but a few of you insist upon making your checks payable to me, personally, for which I am most appreciative. I am thinking of using those payments to add a nice half dime to my collection just to make a point. And to those of you who always ask, I am making a concerted effort to expedite deposit of your dues checks so that they will clear your bank in a timely manner.

If you have moved or have a different mailing address for any reason, please notify me either by mail at the JRCS PO Box, or via email at mrhalfdime(at)aol.com, so that we can get your copies of the journal to you. We consistently have several JR Journals returned by the USPS, listed as "Return as Undeliverable". And if you are a Life Member of the JRCS, please ignore your dues notice, as no payment is due.

Stephen A. Crain - Secretary
John Reich Collectors Society
P. O. Box 1680
Windham, ME 04062
mrhalfdime(at)aol.com
------

Steve Gupta wrote with his report from the FUN Show:

2015 Orlando F.U.N.

It was with great excitement and some trepidation that I had the opportunity to attend my first major coin show in Orlando.  The local shows in my area are a lot of fun, but in no way did they prepare me for what I was to encounter.  My goal was to meet some like-minded collectors and hopefully find some nice Capped Bust Dimes.  Going into the show I only had 10 coins of the series so there are plenty of holes to fill.

During my pre-planning, I contacted W. David Perkins who suggested several dealers who may be able to help me on my quest.  This fortunately whittled the bourse down from over 1000 dealers to around 20.  I did bring my early dime book and some notes.  I would have benefited from bringing a copy of the latest JRCS dime census.  It is a lesson learned for next time.

Compared to my local show, the floor was a zoo.  With map in hand, I started stopping by dealers in geographical order.  It was remarkably difficult to pass case after case of beautiful coins and stay focused.  Everybody was very friendly despite being extremely busy.  Brad Karoleff even made the incredible gesture of calling his friend Charlie to come by as he correctly figured we would enjoy talking about capped bust dime collecting. 

I am slowly building a numismatic library and have a few of the key references.  Through Charlie I learned the importance of past auction catalogs.  I was familiar with Newman, Logan and Lovejoy, but now I need to strongly consider tracking down the Davis and Subjack sales.

I still have mixed feelings on partnering with dealers and creating want lists.  While this is certainly efficient and would improve my chances of finding the right coin that would otherwise be sold in a private sale, it is fun to walk around, see what is available, identify die variety and hem-haw on price, grade, etc.  Going forward, I will probably do a little bit of both.

After my preview of the bourse and conversations with very knowledgeable dealers and collectors, I had a stack of business cards and a running checklist of about a dozen dimes that would fit nicely in my collection.  I narrowed the list down to an 1830 10c, 1834 10c and an 1835 10c.  Unfortunately cash on hand dictated that I pick one.  Usually, I am excited to find a couple of coins a year that I really like.  Now I had three on the same floor.  All three had original surfaces and were in AU condition.  I verified that they were all R1 or R2 varieties. 
On an amazing coincidence, I passed on an 1833 10c JR-8 (R5) as I purchased one from the exact same dealer a couple of years earlier.  This one was in XF45, but I was not ready to upgrade my XF40.

Another lesson learned is that I need to come up with a better note taking system.  I was walking 100 yards between very patient dealers and asking to look at the coins again.  I now have a good excuse to come up with a color abbreviation sheet/visual guide so that I can note toning as being medium gray, silver gray, blue, orange, red, reddish orange, gold, etc.  I do pretty good with noting marks and die state, but the color eludes me.  Describing luster is another challenge.  I see it and appreciate it, but am pressed to describe it.

At the end of the day, I was sucked in by the Colonel Green pedigree on the 1835 10c JR-3 (R2).  The toning was much richer than I have gone for in the past, but I connected with the coin in a way that I did not with the other two coins that had a more medium gray to silver gray toning.  Fortunately, I was able to strike a deal on the coin I had my heart set on.

As an added bonus, I was able to attend the show with my Dad, who introduced me to the hobby.  Although we say we will meet at a coin show together once a year, it does not happen too often.  His budget and collecting interests are different from mine.  That is a good thing, as it allowed me to peruse some auction lots with him and learn about Liberty Seated coinage.  The next major show I attend, I will definitely set aside a couple of hours to look at auction lots.  This is an opportunity not to be squandered.

Finally the show had some great exhibits.  I was very impressed by the young numismatist exhibits.  When I was their age, I would struggle to put together collages for class projects.  These kids are researching and putting together thoughtful exhibits solely on the joy of collecting.
------

The owner of the "Easton Collection" sent his FUN Show report too:
 
It was my Mom’s 85th Birthday the week of FUN and she lives in Florida. Great excuse leaving NYC to attend FUN and see mom. Doesn’t get any better than that - and both Mom and FUN lived up to my highest expectation!

I stayed at FUN from Wednesday to Friday night – here are a few notes from my experience:

On Wednesday, I was able to do Heritage lot viewing to see the bust dimes and quarters. Very glad I did as I didn’t like any of them except the 1818 B-9 quarter (with clash marks) in VF condition. That was CAC’d and I always wanted a B-9 in VF or better condition and this is a great example. I asked a dealer for his thoughts about the coin (he liked it) and I wanted him to represent me in the auction. He got it at the high end of my price range. Boy oh boy, I was thrilled to get it. The under bidder was a friend of mine and when I mentioned that I won the B-9 to him, he mentioned to me that he acquired a B-9 in AU after the auction. We were both thrilled for each other as we got what we wanted! I never had been to a show where there were 2 high grade B-9s for sale. We both were winners!

On Thursday, Stacks-Bowers displayed the Pogue coins. They displayed the coins that they are auctioning off in May 2015. They are the draped and capped bust half dimes, draped bust dimes, draped and capped bust quarters, bust halves and the draped and bust half eagles. Prior to putting them into the showcases, I was personally able to hold and inspect each and every coin being offered! I sat with them and spent about 2 hours inspecting each of the Pogue coins. Some quick comments – the Pogue’s draped and capped bust quarters are so far superior to any other draped and capped quarters collection that I ever viewed. All of these quarters are originally and fantastically toned examples- most of them made my heart stop in amazement. Also, the draped bust dimes are simply amazing. I met Jimmy Hayes who sold the 1796 dime to the Pogues when viewing dime. The 1808 quarter eagle – again amazing. There were about 128 lots and if only one of these coins were offered in auction than that coin would be an auction highlight!  Every coin is a highlight! Great speculation with dealers and collectors on what kind of prices these coins will realize for the best of the best. I am going to Sotheby’s in NYC today to view the Pogue collection again and they will be displaying more Pogue coins including one of the 1804 dollars, an 1822 half eagle and other rarities being offered in November 2015. I will write more about the Pogue coins in a future write-up. Even if you can’t afford these coins, make sure that you look at them carefully because we will never see such a group of coins like this offered in our lifetime. By the way – I heard that Stack's will be displaying the Pogue coins in Long Beach.

On Thursday night, I was walking around the floor and one dealer with modern coins had an 1827 dime in his case. It was a JR-11 graded AU58 with the Eliasberg provenance and it was CAC’d. I asked him to look at it and I noted that this coin was offered last year in a Heritage auction. He offered it to me for a little more than half the price it sold for last year- it was a no-brainer to buy this coin, so I did. Good news, I didn’t have this die marriage yet, so I was thrilled. Also, I was able to acquire a very rare California fractional gold coin that has eluded me for over 10 years.

On Friday, I attended the JRCS meeting and there were 30 to 40 members and guests in attendance. Great seeing and speaking to those in attendance. I will leave others to report more on this meeting.

 Also, on Friday, Rich Uhrich acquired an 1828 large date bust dime in MS-63. This die marriage in mint state has eluded me for over 10 years. When offered to me I considered it mine immediately. Great example and thanks Rich for making my show! 

 My final thoughts from the show – Mom is doing great and happy 85th B’day!  While the internet is great for coin buying, there is no substitute for great relationships with dealers and other coin friends.  I missed the horrible cold weather that week in NY while I was in sunny Florida.  The Partrick coins (including the 1792 patterns) are awesome! There may have been talk about the lack of quality material out there, but it seemed with a little work and some hunting on the floor, quality was out there and priced to sell.  Thank you to my friends at Stack's for the time with the Pogue coins.  There were a lot more coins I wished to acquire, but there is only so much I can do at a show. Thank you for all those that said hello and added to my enjoyment to the show. 

Easton Collection
------

Finally, a request from Richard Meaney:

If you have an 1835 LM-5.1 Capped Bust Half Dime, I am interested in hearing from you.  I have recently found a few so-called 1835 LM-5.1 half dimes that are misattributed, including one in my collection.  These half dimes showed die cracks from the rim to the top of S2, one or more cracks between E2 and S2, and/or full or partial cracks from S2 to the scroll (any of these cracks make the coin an LM-5.2).  Granted, it takes CLOSE EXAMINATION to see these cracks on some coins.  I ask collectors who have the 1835 LM-5.1 remarriage to take a close look at the coin and see if any of these die cracks are present.  Good light and good magnification are a must.  What I am finding is that fine die cracks are frequently present on coins that had been categorized as LM-5.1, typically because the die cracks are so tiny that they escape view if one is not intently looking for them.  Yes, half dollar collectors are getting a chuckle here…I'm asking people to look for "tiny die cracks on tiny coins" and life would be easier if I just collected "real coins" – right? 

If collectors would do this and contact me, I would greatly appreciate it.  I would be happy to inspect the coins for you if you wish (send me an email and we can coordinate).  If you have quality images of your coin(s) and would like to share, that would be great too.

I am working on two articles for the John Reich Journal:  one is a general article on rarity of specific die remarriages and the other is focused on the 1835 LM-5 remarriages.  I expect the former article to be completed first.  It will be only with your assistance that I can thoroughly complete the second article.  You may contact me by replying to the email version of the JR Newsletter or writing to me at jrnewsletter(at)jrcs.org

Thank you,
Richard




Sunday, January 11, 2015

JR Newsletter: 11 January 2015 (223)

Not surprisingly (with the FUN Show concluding in Florida and many focusing their attention to those activities), there are no new contributions this week.  Perhaps next week we will hear from FUN Show attendees?  Hint, hint!