Brad Karoleff wrote:
Sunday, October 10, 2021
Sunday, September 19, 2021
Brad Karoleff wrote:
Sunday, September 5, 2021
Charlie Horning wrote:
I have begun a research project on the 1806 O-111b die state. There has been considerable confusion regarding the definition of the die state as well as the number of unique examples extant.
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Winston Zack wrote:
On September 1st I plan to start contacting folks via email about collecting the 2021 census on counterfeit CBHs. The last census was conducted in 2019 by Larry Schmidt with the results posted at http://www.cccbhcc.com/cccbh-census-.html, and Larry has agreed to let me take the reins for this 2021 census. Since the 2019 census, many new varieties have been documented; additional examples of scarcer varieties have been identified; new collectors have started collecting these counterfeits; and more generally, collections have grown, shrunk, and been sold.
Larry has provided me with a confidential list of prior census participants who I plan to contact via email on September 1. In addition, if you have not been previously contacted about being included in this census and you would like to participate this year, please send an email to – Winston.firstname.lastname@example.org to be added to the contact list. Additional details about this census will be included in the email you receive from me on September 1.
After the census is complete, on or around October 31 I will provide a summary report documenting the results of this census to all participants. In addition, that report, or a similar version, will be posted on the badmetalcoin.com website before the end of 2021.
Sunday, August 8, 2021
David Perkins wrote:
Hope to see many of you at the ANA Convention and JRCS Meeting this coming week!
W. David Perkins Numismatics will have Table 611 featuring a prime Central Location on the Bourse. Richard Meaney, Jim Matthews, and I will be behind the table and look forward to seeing our fellow collectors and dealers.
Highlights include Part I of the Sale of the Richard Meaney CB Half Dime Reference Collection which we purchased a few months ago. This complete set of all known die marriages and remarriages, dates and types, is truly Extraordinary. Formed over 20 plus years, with over three fourths of the collection with CAC Stickers. Eye appeal abounds.
We will also have on display “The Long Island Collection of Dimes,” a high grade and eye appealing date set of Draped and Capped Bust Dimes.
Along with the above two items we’ll have numerous Draped and Capped Bust half dimes, dimes, half dollars, nearly two dozen early dollars, along with Type and a relatively large selection of early and other gold from a multi-million dollar Denver Estate Collection started in the late 1950s! Dates and denominations for the early gold include 1795, 1797 (2 coins), 1799 (2), 1800, 1801, and 1803; 1800 and 1820 $5, and 1805 $2.50.
Should be an exciting and blockbuster show!
W. David Perkins
Sunday, August 1, 2021
Brad Karoleff wrote:
Sunday, July 25, 2021
Dave Kahn wrote:
David Kahn Rare Coins, Inc. is proud to announce that we recently acquired the Dick Graham Reference Collection of Reeded Edge Bust half dollars! The collection lacks just a few things that Dick sold over the last few years or was never able to acquire - his 36 Reeded, 39 Small Letters, the 2 super-rare 39-O marriages, and the 38-O - but everything else is here and will be available at the ANA in Rosemont in just a couple weeks.
There are several Plate coins from his book, a few finest known and high CC coins, and lots of interesting die states too. Most of the coins are in very collectible grades of XF through AU58, all are in PCGS or NGC holders, and nearly all carry the GR attribution on the label. We're particularly impressed with the quality and eye appeal of the 1839's ...if you collect this series or just want to assemble a date run of choice coins, you likely appreciate how tough those are to find. In addition to the coins, we will have copies of Dick's book available (we have just a few left from the second printing, and we have been told in no uncertain terms there will not be a third printing), and we will also have Dick there to answer any questions, offer additional info about the coins and even sign your book!
We look forward to seeing you there. ...table #426. Contact Sales(at)DavidKahnRareCoins.com for more information.
Sunday, July 18, 2021
Readers will recall that Winston Zack asked how many capped bust half dollars might fit into a bushel, all as part of his research into contemporary counterfeit coinage.
Winston received two responses directly, which he summarized with a spreadsheet. You may view this spreadsheet in pdf format, by clicking here.
Thomas Little responded: Thanks, there must have been a lot of these. I was at a flea market in Wilmington Vermont one weekend about 25 years ago where I guy had an earlier bust half for sale which I did not recognize as such for around $75.
Steve Herrman responded (included in Winston’s spreadsheet): Assuming a 32.5 mm (1.28 inch) diameter and a 2.0 mm (0.0787 inch) thickness, the volume taken up by Contemporary Counterfeit Bust half dollars arranged in a rectangular grid would be 1.28 x 1.28 x 0.0787 = 0.128942 cubic inches.
Dividing a bushel (2150.42 cubic inches) by 0.128942 cubic inches per coin = 16,677 coins
The weight would be 16,677 x 13.48 grams (0.0297 pounds) = 495.6 pounds
Gary Rosner responded (included in Winston’s spreadsheet): 25,814
Here is the math I used.
One bushel equals two 5 gallon buckets.
One 5 gallon bucket has a inside volume of about 1110 cubic inches.
So one bushel has a inside volume of about 2220 cubic inches.
A CBH is 1.28” diameter x .067” think, about?
Volume of a CBH is about .086 cubic inches.
2220 cubic inches / .086 cubic inches = 25814, that is an estimate of course.
That was fun!
PS: It must have been super heavy if each CBH is about 13.48g or about .0297 lbs, then x 25,814 is about 767 lbs, wow!
Steve Herrman also wrote about a scheduled JRCS meeting:
JRCS Quarterly Zoom Meeting Scheduled for July 21 Has Been Canceled
There was no volunteer to present or topics to discuss.
The next JRCS Quarterly Zoom Meeting is scheduled for September 15 at 7:00 PM EDT (4:00 PM PDT).
Sheridan Downey wrote:
MAIL BID SALE NO. 52 IS HERE!
The sale closes at 6 PM CDT, Wednesday August 11, 2021, day 2 of the ANA’s World’s Fair of Money in Rosemont, IL. Auction lots, photos and descriptions are available on my web site, www.sheridanscoins.com. Bidding is already underway. The coins will be available for preview at my bourse tables, nos. 317 and 416.
There are 120 coins in the sale. The watchwords for this sale are Eye Candy. The principal consignor, Tim Osborne, spent over 30 years on the hunt for bust half-dollars with exceptional eye appeal. His patience and practiced eye paid off. The 60 pieces laid before us in Part 1 of the Sale (Lots 1-60) will remind you of the collections of Gehring Prouty and Keith Davignon. Not a dud in the bunch. When reviewing Tim’s coins pay special attention to his AU 55s. I have not before seen so many in one collection that left me to wonder, “Why not AU 58?” John Albanese, owner of CAC, probably felt the same way. In June I sent him 56 of Tim’s coins; 38 came back with stickers, including one gold. That is a remarkable batting average!
Dr. Charles Link surprised me with a late consignment of high-grade coins and interesting die states. I hurriedly submitted 16 coins to CAC; 9 came back with stickers. Again, a wonderful result and a testament to his experienced eye. Chuck’s coins are in Part 2 of the Sale, Lots 61-88. I was particularly taken with John Jay Pittman’s 1827.
Howard Sharfman decided to move from bust halves to other numismatic arenas. He was kind enough to sell me his no. 1 rated “Everyman Registry Set” of capped bust half-dollars awhile back. Legend will sell his Registry Set of Early Half-Dollars with Major Varieties in September. If you hanker for 5 and 6 figure coins be sure to ask Legend for a catalog. Part 3 of this Sale, Lots 89-94, is Howard’s consignment of rare capped bust die marriages. The highlight is his R.5+ PCGS AU 58 1827 O.144. Or perhaps you will prefer his dazzling 1809 XXX edge, PCGS AU 58 with CAC sticker.
Several other collectors generously offered one or more pretty coins for the sale. You will find them in Part 4, Lots 95-107. The highlight is Louis Eliasberg’s 1818 O.111 but don’t overlook the gorgeous 1813 O.103, 1818/7 O.101 and 1819 O.114.
The sale concludes with a modest selection from the incomparable collection of bust half errors assembled by Henry Hilgard. The collection has remained intact since it was purchased by a single buyer, not long after Henry died in 2013. This is the first public offering of error coins from the Hilgard collection.
Anyone with questions is welcome to call or email me.
Editor added: You can view this sale here: https://www.sheridanscoins.com/inc_active-mb.php (and the “headline coin” for this week’s JR Newsletter comes from Sheridan’s catalog!).
Sunday, July 11, 2021
I'll get right to the point. I'm researching counterfeit Capped Bust Half Dollars for my next book. In several cases when counterfeiters got arrested the newspapers reported the quantity of counterfeit CBHs found in terms of bushels (8 dry gallons); apparently bushels were quite common, and many counterfeiters used them to accumulate their counterfeit coins and presumably other artifacts of counterfeiting. While this measure and volume was probably decently understood 'back in the day', it does not help me understand how many CBHs could casually fit inside one.
So, JR Newsletter audience, approximately how many CBHs (genuine or counterfeit) can you reasonably expect to fit in a bushel? For many of you tackling this question and problem will be a math problem (which I've attempted but can't figure out - my answers don't seem realistic). However, if you want to build greater authenticity into this answer, I recommend you go and acquire an antique bushel (if you don't already have one), dump your collections (I mean hoards) of raw CBHs into it and get a more realistic quantity.
Any and all answers here will be appreciated and I look forward to seeing your answers!
Thanks in advance,
Sunday, June 27, 2021
Sunday, June 13, 2021
It has been almost two months since we received any input/contributions for publication! We have two contributions this week:
Richard Meaney and David Perkins announce that Richard has sold his complete set of capped bust half dimes to David Perkins Numismatics. Some notable features of the set, at the time of the sale, include the following:
- All 123 die marriages and remarriages are represented
- 100% are in PCGS holders with attribution on the label
- 100% of coins are in straight-graded PCGS holders
- 95/123 coins are CAC
- 4 coins are gold CAC
- 48 coins are top pop or tied for top pop for the variety at PCGS
- 62 coins are top or second in JRCS 2019 condition census
- 5 coins are plate coins from the Logan-McCloskey half dime book
- Notable provenances of the coins include Pittman, Newman, Childs, Reiver, Logan, McCloskey, David Davis, Peterson, Crain, and Matthews
Half dime collectors and other interested parties can contact Perkins concerning his plans with the coins: wdperki(at)attglobal.net
Here is a link to the set on the PCGS Set Registry site: https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/half-dimes/early-half-dimes-specialty-sets/capped-bust-half-dimes-die-variety-set-by-logan-mccloskey-circulation-strikes-1829-1837/alltimeset/78799
(note that at the time of publishing this newsletter, the PCGS website is wonky and is not displaying set images at all)
Brad Karoleff wrote:
The ANA has finalized their schedule for the upcoming convention in Chicago.
JRCS will have our annual meeting on Wednesday morning at 8:30AM in room 7 of the Stephens Convention Center. We hope to see you there.
There will be a journal coming out just before the convention. I do still, however, need some content. Please consider sending something for inclusion in the next issue ASAP.
Sunday, April 18, 2021
Louis Scuderi wrote concerning a recent purchase of a reeded edge half dollar:
Here are some images (above) of a new example of 1838 GR5 that I recently acquired that you might want to include in this week’s Newsletter. Jim Koenings has already written this up in his newsletter so you can get the details there.
Editor: Here is a link to the newsletter, included in the newsletter is Jim Koenings’ email address if you wish to subscribe to this reeded edge half dollar news opportunity. https://mcusercontent.com/74a0e3c37d154d935bdeb2daf/files/e2fcc1ca-d5c4-40a2-9add-b6dfc43f277b/Reeded_Edge_Half_Dollar_Newsletter_24.pdf
Sunday, April 11, 2021
Brad Karoleff wrote:
The latest issue of the John Reich Journal is on the way. The printer did a great job presenting the articles from the membership. I think you will be pleased with the results.
If anyone does not receive their issue by the 25th, please let me know and we will forward a replacement to you.
Some of you have still not remitted your dues for 2021. If you have not paid your mailing label will say "DUES" after your name and there will be a yellow reminder inside the envelope. This will be your final chance to renew your membership and receive all the issues planned for 2021.
Stay safe and health. Have some fun with your hobby.
Steve Herrman created and released a set of searchable reference tables listing the 760 articles written over the last 35 years. The three files, sorted by Author, Subject, and Whole Number & Page, are in searchable PDF format …you can go to the JRCS web page to access this information. If you would like a copy of the reference tables in Microsoft Excel format, contact the website administrator.
The link to the searchable tables is here: http://www.jrcs.org/jrcs_journals.php
Bill Nyberg wrote in response to David Finkelestein:
Regarding David Finkelstein’s 4-4-21 post about two supposed early Mint screw presses, there was an excellent article by Craig Sholley in the January 2018 Penny-Wise “The Myth of the U.S. Mint’s First Screw Press” which is now available for reading on the NNP. The Table of Contents in Penny-Wise list the title of the Sholley article as I wrote, but the title at the head of the article was - The Myth of the U.S. Mint's So-Called "First Screw Press"
Craig gives dimensional evidence that proves this screw press was designed and used as a planchet cutting screw press.
Craig also debunked the myth of Jacob E. and/or Adam Eckfeldt as having fabricated this Mint screw press, in either 1792 or 1798, mentioning my Scot biography as a source, “Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty.” There is a 1798 letter to Adam Eckfeldt from the Treasury Department requesting the status of ordered screw presses. However, these were not coinage screw presses, they were eighteen embossed stamp screw presses that were contracted to Adam Eckfeldt to have fabricated for the Treasury Department. These were C-shaped in structure to allow a document to lie flat for stamping, as opposed to inverted U-shaped coinage screw presses. To go with the stamp screw presses, Robert Scot engraved 15 different denominations of revenue stamps for each of the 16 states.
In the same issue of Penny-Wise, I wrote an article that describes the history and usage of the Federal revenue stamps and screw presses supplied by the Mint to the Treasury Department, “Defending Liberty: Robert Scot and Adam Eckfeldt Create Wartime Revenue Stamps at the Mint.” These revenue stamps were strategically crucial in raising funds as part of the financing for the Quasi-War, First Barbary War, and the War of 1812.
This is an image of a revenue stamped estate inventory from my collection, which was stamped with a die engraved in 1798 by Robert Scot, and pressed with a stamp screw press supplied by Adam Eckfeldt:
David Finkelstein wrote:
Update: The Mint’s First Coining Press
The majority of my more recent research efforts and articles could not have been completed without the collaboration and support of others. Robert Julian has assisted me greatly in the interpretation of some of the Mint documents stored at the National Archives and Records Administration. Even though they were hand written in English, they were hand written in 18th century English. It some cases, 18th century style letters, numbers and symbols required Robert’s translation expertise to make sense out of critical portions of documents. In 2017, my research on the 1794 Dollars would have been incomplete had I not collaborated with Len Augsburger and Joel Orosz. All of our research was combined so we could publish “Who Deposited the Silver for the 1794 Dollars?” in the December 2017 JRJ. Likewise, the July 2019 JRJ article titled “Compositional Analysis for 1794 & 1795 Dated United States Silver Coins” would never have been published had Christopher Pilliod and I not collaborated on the project’s phase 1 effort from 2015 through July 2019. Chris had the chemical, metallurgical and scientific technology expertise, whereas I was knowledgeable about the various Mint Acts, and the first Mint’s personnel, workflow, implementation standards, business practices, accounts receivables and payables., and contemporary documents
In last week’s JRN I published a draft article on the Mint’s so-called first coining press that is currently on display at both the Philadelphia and Denver Mints. I knew that some parts of the article were correct, I knew that some parts were probably incorrect, and I definitely knew that I was missing some critical information. That is why I published what I had, and asked for assistance. The assistance I received was significantly more than expected. I corresponded via email with Len Augsburger, Bill Eckberg, Michael Rocco, Craig Sholley and Pete Smith, and I had phone conversations with John Dannreuther and Tim Grant. Tim Grant is Public Affairs Manager for the United States Mint at Philadelphia.
As a result of the tremendous support received from the aforementioned people, there is new information regarding the Mint’s so-called first coining press. Rather than publishing a revised article, here is the new information I obtained:
1, The Mint believed that they had the original coining press that was first used in 1792. This belief was passed down from Mint officer to Mint officer, and/or from Mint Public Affairs Manager to Mint Public Affair Manager over the centuries. This screw press is on display at the Philadelphia Mint. Here is a link to a slide show tour of the Philadelphia Mint. The so called original press is on slide 4. It is the same press that is pictured on page 62 in 1792: Birth of a Nation’s Coinage:
Here is a link to a YouTube Philadelphia Mint Virtual Tour video [I could not get the volume to work]. The so called original press is at the 0:50 mark of the video.
2. In last week’s JRN article, I pictured a screw press from alamy.com. This was the screw press at the Mint exhibit at the 1904 Louisiana Exposition. It is now confirmed that this screw press was a replica made in Philadelphia prior to the 1904 Louisiana. It was transported from the Philadelphia Mint to the Louisiana Exposition, then transported to the Denver Mint after the Exposition ended. It is currently on display at the Denver Mint as a replica of the first 1792 coining press.
3. Tim Grant (Public Affairs Manager for the United States Mint at Philadelphia) stated that another replica was made of the so called original coining press. It is in the auditorium at the Philadelphia Mint. This replica is accessible to people taking the Philadelphia Mint tour. [Note: Due to the pandemic, the Mint has stopped providing tours.]
4. The overall consensus of numismatic researchers is that the so called original “coining” press at the Philadelphia Mint may be a “cutting” press. Due to the small size of the screw press, it may have been used to cut/stamp blank planchets out of roll strip. Further evidence that this press may be a cutting press came to light during my phone conversation with Tim Grant.
5. According to Tim Grant… In 1992, to celebrate the Mint’s bicentennial, the Mint planned on striking a medal in copper using the so called original coining press. Dies were prepared, and copper blanks were made. The so called original coining press was unable to generate the force required to impart the design from the dies onto the copper blanks. The screw press was, however, able to generate enough force to impart the design on lead blanks.
[Note: Copper has a tensile strength of 210 Mpa (megapascals) and a Mohs hardness or 3.0, whereas Lead has a tensile strength of 18 MPa and a Mohs hardness of 1.5. It does not take a significant amount of force to impart designs on lead blanks.]
6. When tours are resumed at the Philadelphia Mint, Tim Grant will provide special access for a detailed inspection of the so called original coining press. Maybe something can be scheduled prior to a Baltimore coin show once life as we knew it returns somewhat normal?
To be continued sometime in the future …
Sunday, April 4, 2021
David Finkelstein wrote:
The following is a start of an article. It is not complete. Although some parts are correct, some parts may be incorrect. I am publishing this in the JRN because I need assistance in solving this puzzle.
While participating in a Facebook group discussion, someone posted the following two links:
- Inside The Denver Mint: The First Coining Press
- First coining press used in the United States Mint
Each web page contains a picture of a screw press:
Denver Mint (usmint.gov)
The Denver Mint claims that the screw press pictured on their website “is a replica of the first coining press from 1792… This coining press was used to produce trial coins in 1792 and many of the half-cents and cents of 1793”. Note that this screw press is also imaged on page 62 of 1792: Birth of a Nation’s Coinage.
Alamy.com claims that the screw press on their website was displayed by the United States Mint at the 1904 St. Louis Exposition (aka the Louisiana Purchase Exposition or the 1904 World’s Fair) as the “first coining press used in the united states Mint. Over one Hundred Years old”.
Ignoring the tables that the presses are on, the two presses look similar, but are definitely not identical. Since they are clearly not the same screw press, how can they both be the first coining press?
Per 1792: Birth of a Nation’s Coinage, it is believed that the trial coins of 1792 were struck in John Harper's cellar around July 11-13, 1792. We do not know when the Mint acquired their first screw press. We do know that the first expense warrant for a “press” was Warrant 7 and issued on August 29, 1792 to pay John Harper $247.85 "for cutting presses castings". Note that the Mint paid John Harper for cutting presses, and not simply a cutting press. Also note that the warrant was for cutting presses and not screw presses, and not cutting and screw presses. Also, $247.85 was a lot of money for one press, so the Mint most likely acquired multiple presses.
Is the screw press pictured on the Mint’s website one of the cutting presses obtained from John Harper and not a coining press? It looks like a coining press without a collar to me. Was the screw press used to strike the 1792 coinage in John Harper’s cellar, then sold to the Mint, paid for on August 29, 1792, and used to strike the copper coins of 1793? Maybe the screw press on alamy.com was also John Harper’s? Maybe both were sold to the Mint by John Harper? I have not seen any contemporary evidence to verify that either screw press was John Harper’s. I emailed the Mint for assistance, clarification and documentation regarding their claim that their screw press was the first coining press. Hopefully, I will receive a response.
Note that there is a flaw with the statement made on the Mint’s website that “this coining press was used to produce trial coins in 1792 and many of the half-cents and cents of 1793”. We know that the second time a “press” was paid for by the Mint was on June 3, 1794. Expense Warrant 84 paid Hannah Ogden $47.44 “in full of her account for a coining Press for the use of the Mint”. Is it therefore logical to assume that prior to the arrival of the coining press purchased from Hannah Ogden, the only coining press (or presses) in use by the Mint was the one (or more than one?) purchased from John Harper in 1792? Since 10,000 half cents and 297,300 cents were delivered from Chief Coiner Henry Voigt to Treasurer of the Mint Tristram Dalton between January 13 and March 28, 1794, they could not have been struck on the coining press purchased from Hannah Ogden. If, in fact, the screw press imaged on the Mint’s website is a replica of the first coining press purchased from John Harper, then the coining press was used to produce the trial coins in 1792, all of the half cents and cents of 1793, and many of the half cents and cents of 1794.
Note that the press pictured on the Mint’s website does not have a retaining collar that moved up and down as the press was cycled to center the planchet on the anvil die. I do not claim to be an expert on the minting of half cents and cents. Were the half cents and cents of 1793 and 1794 struck in an open collar or struck without a collar? If anyone knows and can enlighten me on this, please contact me at dfinkelstein(at)comcast.net
Regarding the screw press that is pictured on alamy.com… I can see the screw in the picture on the Mint’s website, so I can envision the hammer moving downwards towards the anvil. I cannot see the screw in the picture on alamy.com, so it is unclear if it is embedded within the press and not visible. Also, I cannot tell if the hammer is fully retracted, the hammer has come into contact with the anvil, if the press has a collar, or if the press is a coining press. The only thing I can tell is that it is not the same press that is pictured on the Mint’s website.
If anyone can provide additional information, references, pictures, or assistance, please contact me at dfinkelstein(at)comcast.net
Steve Herrman wrote:
Auction & Mail Bid Prices Realized for Bust Half Dollars 1794-1839, Spring 2021 Revision, Number 58 was published and distributed to regular subscribers last month. This issue includes the revised rarity rating estimates from the 2020 study completed by the Bust Half Nut Club Rarity Ratings Committee last December. The information from the study was approved for public release in February.
This issue includes auction records for R4 to R8 varieties from all major auctions for a minimum of the last 10 years, and Condition Census specimens for all varieties. Separate sections are included for overdates & other popular varieties, proofs, mint errors & patterns, countermarks, and contemporary counterfeits.
To receive a copy, please contact Steve at herrman102(at)aol.com
This is a semi-yearly publication. $2.50 is donated to the JRCS for each copy sold.
Steve Herrman, JRCS LM #28
Sunday, March 28, 2021
We have contributions today from Winston Zack and Patrick Bain, with a common theme of the JRCS on Facebook between them.
Winston Zack wrote:
JRCS is going digital in the 21st century. We have a website, a weekly email newsletter, the JRJ, and we're on Facebook; and maybe I'm forgetting other areas too! All these corners of the internet have different purposes and goals to enhance the participation for members and non-members (who we encourage to join the JRCS), especially during these 'fun' covid times!
Specifically, the JRCS has two Facebook groups; links below. These are private groups only for JRCS members. It is not visible to non-JRCS members in order to address member privacy concerns and associated interests.
The main John Reich Collectors Society Facebook group currently has 38 members participating. We want to grow this to at least 100 JRCS members in the near future. Starting in April we will be hosting regular themed show-and-tell posts on top of normal posts.
April will be 'weirdest JRCS-related coin in your set', an idea posed by Gawain O'Connor. Personally, I can't think of what the weirdest JRCS-related coin in my set includes, but I'm sure I'll find something interesting to share.
FINALLY - our next JRCS Zoom meeting is on May 19, 2021. We are still looking for a featured speaker to give a 30-40 minute presentation on some JRCS related topic. Please contact me at email@example.com if you would like to give a talk for this next meeting. Thanks!
Patrick Bain wrote:
We would like to conduct a survey as to how many members use Facebook.
I need as many members to take the survey as possible.
It's only one question, so will take about 10 seconds of your time!
Here is a link to the survey:
Also here is a link to our Facebook group. Membership is growing!
Finally, last week's announcement of an auction of some wonderful capped bust half dollars was not posted in this blog (it went solely to the email version of the JR Newsletter). If you are interested in half dollars with luster, color, great surfaces, and overall sweet eye appeal, check out the Burrowing Owl Collection on Gerry Fortin's web site (auction ends this week): https://www.seateddimevarieties.com/auction.html
Sunday, March 21, 2021
Dave Wnuck wrote:
Sunday, March 14, 2021
Jim Matthews wrote:
I want to share a bit about the state of the coin market lately. Despite not having many shows other than some smaller regional events, the coin market has been extremely active. Most dealers I've talked to have sold off considerable inventory and are looking to replace it, but unable to find many of their usual scarcer dates. Online sales from dealers have been reported to be brisk. I've been buying coins at various actions and had to pay up well ahead of the so called sheet prices or recent auction records to obtain any coins, even for comparatively common issues. So while we've been holding down our respective forts for an entire year now, at least the value and interest in our collections appears to be going up. This is a very good thing, as a few years ago I was beginning to wonder who was going to come along and buy my collection when the time came to sell! Now I'm not so worried about that.
During the pandemic one of my collector friends has spent some of his time creating his own coins via photoshop, using existing coins but swapping the dates and mintmarks around. Needless to say his creativity knows no bounds...here's one enticing example that could have, dare I say should have existed, but as far as I know, only in digital form! That dastardly Mint Fire took out most of the planned coinage of 1816. Its nice to imagine holding a gem 1869-CC dime for instance, or an 1870-CC! There are no limits to what can be created these days.
Garrett Ziss wrote:
JRCS members Daryl Haynor and Garrett Ziss will be presenting at the upcoming 2021 Newman Numismatic Portal Symposium.
Daryl’s presentation, United States Classic Gold of 1834-1839, is scheduled for Sunday, March 21st, at 10:00 am.Author Haynor will explore the Numismatic Literary Guild 2020 Book of the Year: United States Classic Gold Coins of 1834-1839. The presentation will focus on the historical section and explore the economic and political context of the 1830’s, reveal historic documents never before published, and debunk many accepted numismatic tales. It is the only book written about the series, and already is the authoritative reference used by PCGS, NGC, Stack’s, Heritage, et al.
Garrett’s presentation, From the War of 1812 to the Civil War: A Chronology of a Numismatic Marriage, is scheduled for Saturday, March 20th at 11:00 am. This 50-minute presentation chronicles the presence of both the Bust and Liberty Seated coin images that were selectively displayed on obsolete paper money for much of the 19th century. The discussion time is evenly split between the two coin designs and highlights their coexistence during the Hard Times Period. The Bust section is entirely new and approaches the subject from a different perspective than Garrett’s 2015 program on this topic at the JRCS Annual Meeting in Chicago.
To attend either presentation, please register at https://nnpsymposium.org. There is also a wide-range of other numismatic sessions that may be of interest to club members and they are detailed here: https://nnpsymposium.org/schedule#da8bfb39-a57a-4cbe-a380-ea60c9663696. Registration covers attendance at an unlimited number of sessions.